Curbing Inflammation in Skin Wound Healing a Review
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Chronic wounds stand for an economic burden to healthcare systems worldwide and a societal brunt to patients, deeply impacting their quality of life. The incidence of recalcitrant wounds has been steadily increasing since the population more than susceptible, the elderly and diabetic, are rapidly growing. Chronic wounds are characterised by a delayed wound healing process that takes longer to heal under standard of care than acute (i.e. healthy) wounds. Two of the nigh common issues associated with chronic wounds are inflammation and infection, with the latter usually exacerbating the erstwhile. With this in listen, researchers and wound care companies accept developed and marketed a wide diverseness of wound dressings presenting dissimilar compositions simply all aimed at promoting healing. This makes it harder for physicians to choose the right therapy, peculiarly given a lack of public quantitative data to support the manufacturers' claims. This review aims at giving a cursory introduction to the clinical need for chronic wound dressings, focusing on inflammation and evaluating how bio-derived and synthetic dressings may control backlog inflammation and promote healing.
Introduction
Wound healing is a complex procedure that involves numerous cell types, cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, which work synergistically to achieve healing [1,2]. It consists of four overlapping stages: haemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and remodelling, each with its own part and role valuable for the side by side phase to occur smoothly and with no delay [one,2]. In a healthy wound (i.due east. acute wound), these stages unremarkably occur with no obstacle, resulting in a completely healed wound with minimal scar tissue, admitting with slightly reduced mechanical properties (∼80%), when compared with the skin before injury [3].
A chronic wound is defined every bit a wound that has failed to proceed through the wound healing process readily, and it does non heal within iii months under standard of care [2,4]. It ordinarily results when patients present comorbidities such as diabetes, obesity, immune system deficiencies, peripheral vascular disease and cardiopulmonary disease [1,2,5]. These wounds often stall in the inflammatory stage, whereby excess and persistent inflammation creates a hostile wound surroundings. A wound that is ho-hum or fails to heal is at greater risk of infection. If infection does occur, the heightened inflammation is further exacerbated [1,2]. Chronic wounds include diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), pressure ulcers (PUs) and leg ulcers (LUs), which include venous leg ulcers, arterial leg ulcers and ulcers of mixed aetiology [4].
Wound care and chronic wounds, in particular, represent a health economic burden worldwide, bookkeeping for an NHS almanac expenditure in the management of chronic wounds of £five.3billion with a hateful toll of £3700 per unhealed wound [6,7]. With such a demand, the global advanced wound dressings marketplace targeting chronic and surgical wounds is expected to exceed ∼£16.5 billion past 2024 [5]. Furthermore, as population and life expectancy increases, the outcome of wound management and chronic wounds on global wellness services will increase further, calling for the development of therapies that can relieve both patients and healthcare systems of this economic and societal burden [8,9].
Two main factors that are usually addressed as common underlying bug in non-healing wounds are inflammation and infection [ii]. Infection occurs when immune cells fail to readily eliminate harmful microorganisms infiltrating the wound [10]. Dissimilar grades of infection require different therapies and present unlike degrees of severity: local infection (when infection is contained only at the wound site, normally easy to address); spreading infection (signs and symptoms of infection outside wound border in neighbouring tissues); systemic infection (affects the whole body and may nowadays a severe upshot for the health of the patient) [ii]. Infection is a major contributing factor to the failure of a wound to heal [two].
Inflammation represents the body'south allowed organisation response to foreign agents such as microorganisms or damaged host tissue; therefore, information technology is necessary and essential to achieving healing [11]. Inflammation occurs in two stages: early and tardily inflammation [1,two]. During early inflammation, the innate immune organization is activated, and neutrophils are recruited in the wound to remove microorganisms, cellular debris and not-functional tissue [i,9,11]. Neutrophils are followed by infiltrating monocytes that differentiate into 'M1' pro-inflammatory macrophages every bit a response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), IL-ii, IFN-γ and TNF-α [9,12,13]. 'M1' macrophages present a high phagocytic capability, and their primary role is to remove any harmful agents. They also secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines such equally IL-one, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) [9,12,13]. ROS are produced equally a mechanism of killing microorganisms, merely in excess, when inflammation is out of control, they crusade direct tissue damage to the ECM and result in premature prison cell senescence [xiv]. MMPs dethrone the damaged ECM to allow infiltration of pro-healing cells and factors [nine,13]. It is idea that elevated levels of MMPs participate in stalling and delaying the wound healing procedure in chronic wounds [9,13]. This is because there is a delicate balance betwixt MMPs and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPS) [ix,xiii]. When this balance is tipped in favour of MMPs, degradation of healthy tissue and subsequent persistent inflammation creates a negative feedback loop that contributes to delayed healing [9,13]. In an acute wound, once inflammation is resolved and the wound is cleared of contamination, healing progresses into the proliferative phase, where granulation tissue is formed. Keratinocytes start to proliferate and migrate across the wound bed to re-epithelialise the wound [ix,thirteen]. More macrophages switch from the pro-inflammatory 'M1' phenotype to the pro-healing 'M2' phenotype, becoming the most mutual leukocyte in the wound [nine,12,thirteen]. At this signal, a chronic wound tends to stall since 'M1' macrophages persist without switching to the 'M2' phenotype, resulting in elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines produced by 'M1' macrophages and by the delayed removal of expended neutrophils [9,xi–thirteen]. Information technology is worth noting that macrophages do non present a binary nomenclature of phenotype, only rather a spectrum, as shown in Figure 1; however, in this review, 'M1' and 'M2' terminology volition be used for simplicity [11,xiii]. A prolonged and heightened state of inflammation, no thing the cause, results in delayed healing. Various means have been proved to curb inflammation in wound healing [15,sixteen]; in this paper, nosotros review how wound dressings reduce backlog inflammation assuasive chronic wounds to heal more readily.
Schematic of the wound healing stages focusing on macrophage phenotypes classification in vivo and in vitro with their corresponding functions.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the wound healing stages focusing on macrophage phenotypes classification in vivo and in vitro with their respective functions.
Adapted with permission from [xiii]. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the wound healing stages focusing on macrophage phenotypes classification in vivo and in vitro with their corresponding functions.
Adapted with permission from [13]. Created with BioRender.com.
Close modal
Wound dressings: an introduction
The increasing prevalence of chronic wounds highlights the importance of developing innovative products to promote healing [two,17]. In a clinical setting, when a patient presents a wound, clinicians utilise a set of principles that aids them to understand the wound aetiology and subsequent wound bed training [17,xviii]. These principles are represented past the acronym Time, which is defined as Tissue cess and direction, Infection/Inflammation management, Moisture imbalance/management and Edge of wound observation and management [17,eighteen]. Even when Fourth dimension management is followed, some wounds fail to heal and require more advanced interventions to restart the healing process [17,18].
Over time, wound management has evolved drastically, from assuming that a dry out wound environment would assist healing to prioritise moisture retention when developing new wound dressings [19]. This shift in knowledge was mirrored in the shift in the type of wound dressings used. The more than traditional wound dressings (e.g. gauze, lint and cotton fiber wool), which aimed at only covering the wound, have now been replaced by sophisticated materials (due east.m. hydrogels, hydrocolloids, foams, films, etc.) that aim to [19–21]:
-
Provide or maintain a moist environment;
-
Heighten cellular migration;
-
Promote angiogenesis and new tissue synthesis;
-
Allow gas exchange from/to wound;
-
Maintain appropriate tissue temperature;
-
Protect confronting bacterial infection;
-
Exist easily removed after healing or between dressing changes;
-
Promote autolytic debridement;
-
Exist sterile, non-toxic and hypoallergenic.
One of the more contempo advantages introduced into wound dressing formulations, and an indirect way to reduce inflammation by resolving bioburden, is the addition of antimicrobial agents such as antiseptics, antibiotics and natural products [22]. Several reviews provide additional information for a more detailed assay of the different types of antimicrobial agents and dressings [23–25].
There are thousands of wound dressings on today'due south market, some claiming the aforementioned benefits but presenting unlike compositions [ii,21]. This large number of options makes choosing an appropriate dressing an ever so complicated chore for physicians [ii,21,26]. Choosing an advisable dressing is essential to attain faster healing and depends on many factors, including the type and location of the wound, the level of exudate, the integrity of the surrounding skin, and whether the wound is infected or stalled in the inflammatory phase of healing [21,23,24,27]. A summary of different types of wound dressings is given in Tabular array 1.
Table 1.
Summary of different types of dressing with the corresponding description
Blazon of dressings | Description | Ref |
---|---|---|
Gauze | Drying Cheap May produce painful removal | [19–21] |
Foams | Soft and conformable Loftier porosity, moderately absorbent Thermal insulating Wounds may dry out if little or no exudate | [23,24] |
Films | Occlusive, retains moisture No absorptive properties Protects against infection Can cause fluid collection | [19,20,102,103] |
Hydrogels | Maintain moist environment Aid in autolytic debridement Rehydrates dry wound Easy removal Not suitable for heavily exuding wounds May crave secondary dressing | [20,103–105] |
Hydrocolloids | Occlusive Highly absorbent May cause peri-wound maceration May adhere to the wound and damage frail tissue | [23,24,103,106] |
Alginates | Moderate-highly absorbent Haemostatic Maintain moist surround Not suitable for dry out wounds May crave secondary dressing | [20,103,107,108] |
Gelling Fibres | Moderate-highly absorbent Maintain moist environs Forms gel when in contact with exudate Easy to remove Not suitable for dry wounds | [109,110] |
Superabsorbent dressings | Highly absorptive Conformable Prevents maceration Non suitable for dry wounds | [111–114] |
Type of dressings | Clarification | Ref |
---|---|---|
Gauze | Drying Inexpensive May produce painful removal | [19–21] |
Foams | Soft and conformable Loftier porosity, moderately absorbent Thermal insulating Wounds may dry out if little or no exudate | [23,24] |
Films | Occlusive, retains wet No absorbent properties Protects confronting infection Can crusade fluid drove | [nineteen,20,102,103] |
Hydrogels | Maintain moist surroundings Aid in autolytic debridement Rehydrates dry wound Like shooting fish in a barrel removal Not suitable for heavily exuding wounds May require secondary dressing | [20,103–105] |
Hydrocolloids | Occlusive Highly absorbent May crusade peri-wound maceration May adhere to the wound and damage fragile tissue | [23,24,103,106] |
Alginates | Moderate-highly absorptive Haemostatic Maintain moist environment Not suitable for dry wounds May require secondary dressing | [xx,103,107,108] |
Gelling Fibres | Moderate-highly absorbent Maintain moist environs Forms gel when in contact with exudate Piece of cake to remove Not suitable for dry out wounds | [109,110] |
Superabsorbent dressings | Highly absorbent Conformable Prevents maceration Non suitable for dry wounds | [111–114] |
As described earlier, pathologically extensive inflammation plays an essential part in the delayed wound healing process of chronic ulcers [28]. This is usually acquired by multifactorial stimuli that create a hostile microenvironment (east.g. excess levels of inflammatory cells) in which the balance between pro-inflammatory mediators (due east.chiliad. chemokines, cytokines, proteases) and their inhibitors is disrupted [28]. The large number of biological entities involved in the inflammatory process makes anti-inflammatory wound dressings varied in their mechanisms of activity. For example, some only address locking in exudate away from the wound bed forth with the inflammatory components present in wound exudate [29,30]. Others instead focus on regulating pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines either directly or via macrophage phenotype regulation [31–35]. Nonetheless, the ultimate aim of anti-inflammatory wound dressings is to remove the perpetuating cause and provide a healthy wound microenvironment to promote granulation tissue formation and to promote the healing processes [28].
Bio-derived wound dressings to regulate inflammation
In the terminal decade, more researchers investigated bio-derived materials as building blocks for new wound dressings [36,37]. These aim to mimic the skin'due south ECM to provide the chronic wound with a substrate that tin function as a healthy ECM or equally a sacrificial scaffold for proteases degradation, thereby protecting the native ECM and rebalancing the wound microenvironment allowing for faster healing. The ECM is more than a passive concrete substrate for cells; information technology actively participates in prison cell–cell communications via prison cell–matrix interactions, every bit a result of and resulting in the activation of biochemical mediators, cytokines and growth factors, which play a pregnant office in wound physiology [38–40]. Although bio-derived materials can provide a high caste of biomimicry, they can be limited by their reproducibility during manufacturing, given past variance between batches [37,41]. The utilisation of animal sources raises business organization as well from the manual of pathogens standpoint [42].
The skin ECM comprises the epidermal ECM (i.due east. a basement membrane, which separates the epidermis from the dermis) and the dermal ECM. The latter is composed of fibroblasts embedded in connective tissue fibres, interstitial fluid, cell adhesion proteins (eastward.grand. laminin, vitronectin, fibronectin), glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and proteoglycans [43]. Collagen is the major component of dermal ECM, bookkeeping for ∼seventy% of peel (dry weight) [44]. It presents 28 genetically different variants, with blazon I and Three variants being the almost abundant in the skin [44–46].
Refer to Tabular array 2 for a summary of currently commercially available dressings or in the research stage of development.
Table 2.
Non-exhaustive summary of wound dressings with anti-inflammatory effects currently on the market (M) or in the research (R) stage, showing their composition and reported anti-inflammatory power
Dressing | Composition | Anti-inflammatory effects | Market place (jurisdiction) or research | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bio-derived Dressings | ||||
Endoform® Antimicrobial Dermal Template | Decellularised ovine forestomach matrix with 0.3%due west/due west silver chloride | Broad-spectrum of MMPs inactivation capability Retention of structural molecules and growth factors | M(US) | [32,57,61] |
Puracol® Ultra Matrix | Decellularised porcine mesothelium matric | Memory of growth factors (FGF-basic, VEGF, and TGF-β1) MMPs inactivation adequacy | 1000(US) | [58] |
Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template | Cross-linked bovine tendon collagen type I, shark chondroitin-6-sulfate GAG, silicon membrane | Chondroitin-vi-sulfate GAG has anti-inflammatory properties Allows quick permeation of cells | 1000(United states & European union) | [49–53] |
OASIS® Ultra Tri-Layer Matrix | Decellularised porcine small intestinal submucosa | Retention of structural molecules and growth factors | K(United states) | [54,115–117] |
Apligraf® | Bovine type I collagen seeded with human neonatal fibroblasts and keratinocytes | ↑ VEGF, IL-6, IL-viii ↓ fibrotic TGF-β1 Restore fibroblasts function | Thou(US) | [118–123] |
Q-peptide | Chitosan-collagen hydrogel functionalised with QHREDGS peptide | Provide resistance to oxidative stress Induce shift in macrophage polarisation | R | [33,86–88] |
Co-modified CBD-VEGF-SDF-1α collagen scaffold | Collagen scaffold modified with CBD-VEGF-SDF-1α | ↓ Infiltration of 'M1' macrophages ↓ IL-1β and TNF-α | R | [34] |
NAg-CSS | Chitosan-collagen loaded with silver nanoparticles | Attune macrophage polarisation ↓ IL-6, TNF-α and TGF-β ↑ IL-10 and IFN-γ | R | [35] |
Promogran™ Matrix | Freeze-dried matrix composed of 55% bovine blazon I collagen with 45% ORC | Demark and inactivate proteases by means of ORC Bind and protect naturally occurring growth factors Demonstrate costless radical scavenging properties and anti-inflammatory activeness in vitro | Grand(United states & EU) | [viii,82–85,124] |
Promogran Prisma™ Matrix | Freeze-dried matrix composed of 55% bovine type I collagen with 44% ORC and 1% silver-ORC | Same benefits as Promogran™ Matrix Silver provides both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. | M(US & European union) | [8,82–85,124] |
ColActive® PLUS | Porcine collagen, sodium alginate, CMC, EDTA and silver chloride | EDTA and collagen target and deactivate elevated MMP Activity | Yard(Usa & EU) | [125–127] |
Suprasorb® Ten + PHMB | Biocellulose dressing made up of small-pored HydroBalance fibres that are produced using Acetobacter xylinium | Exudate control | M(US & EU) | [128–132] |
BIOSTEP™ Collagen Matrix | Porcine gelatin and blazon I collagen matrix, EDTA, CMC and alginate | EDTA and collagen target and conciliate elevated MMPs activeness | Grand(US) | [74,75] |
Cutimed® Epiona | Fenestrated substrate fabricated of xc% native bovine-derived collagen and 10% alginate | MMPs sequestered past the substrate due to collagen-binding properties. | M(US & Eu) | [76,77] |
Grafix® | Cryopreserved placental membrane, comprised of native viable cells, GFs and ECM | Retentivity of epithelial cells, fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells ↓ TNF-α and IL-1α ↑ IL-10 | Chiliad(US) | [133–136] |
Constructed Dressings | ||||
UrgoStart® | Soft-adherent foam dressing with TLC and NOSF | Neutralisation of excess proteases | M(European union) | [95–101] |
PVA Sponge + MCG | Polyvinyl alcohol sponge impregnated with modified collagen gel | Promote shift of macrophage phenotype from 'M1' to 'M2' ↑ IL-10, IL-4 and VEGF | R | [31] |
Drawtex® | Hydroconductive dressing obtained using LevaFibre™ technology, made of two absorbent, cross-activeness structures of viscose (63.ii%) and polyester (26.viii%) | Locks exudate and components away from the wound through capillary action ↓ MMPs levels | M(United states of america & Eu) | [29,thirty,137] |
Biatain® Ag | Polyurethane cream with semi-permeable, bacteria- and top waterproof picture show | Exudate control Minimise take chances of maceration and leakage | M(European union) | [138–141] |
Dermagraft® | Polyglactin mesh with neonatal foreskin fibroblasts | Stimulate granulation tissue formation Stimulate secretion of cytokines and growth factors | M(US) | [142–146] |
Dressing | Composition | Anti-inflammatory furnishings | Market (jurisdiction) or research | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bio-derived Dressings | ||||
Endoform® Antimicrobial Dermal Template | Decellularised ovine forestomach matrix with 0.3%w/w silver chloride | Broad-spectrum of MMPs inactivation adequacy Retention of structural molecules and growth factors | M(The states) | [32,57,61] |
Puracol® Ultra Matrix | Decellularised porcine mesothelium matric | Retention of growth factors (FGF-basic, VEGF, and TGF-β1) MMPs inactivation capability | M(United states) | [58] |
Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template | Cross-linked bovine tendon collagen type I, shark chondroitin-6-sulfate GAG, silicon membrane | Chondroitin-half dozen-sulfate GAG has anti-inflammatory properties Allows quick permeation of cells | M(U.s. & EU) | [49–53] |
Oasis® Ultra Tri-Layer Matrix | Decellularised porcine pocket-size intestinal submucosa | Retention of structural molecules and growth factors | M(The states) | [54,115–117] |
Apligraf® | Bovine type I collagen seeded with human neonatal fibroblasts and keratinocytes | ↑ VEGF, IL-half-dozen, IL-eight ↓ fibrotic TGF-β1 Restore fibroblasts role | M(The states) | [118–123] |
Q-peptide | Chitosan-collagen hydrogel functionalised with QHREDGS peptide | Provide resistance to oxidative stress Induce shift in macrophage polarisation | R | [33,86–88] |
Co-modified CBD-VEGF-SDF-1α collagen scaffold | Collagen scaffold modified with CBD-VEGF-SDF-1α | ↓ Infiltration of 'M1' macrophages ↓ IL-1β and TNF-α | R | [34] |
NAg-CSS | Chitosan-collagen loaded with silvery nanoparticles | Modulate macrophage polarisation ↓ IL-vi, TNF-α and TGF-β ↑ IL-ten and IFN-γ | R | [35] |
Promogran™ Matrix | Freeze-dried matrix equanimous of 55% bovine type I collagen with 45% ORC | Bind and inactivate proteases by means of ORC Demark and protect naturally occurring growth factors Demonstrate free radical scavenging backdrop and anti-inflammatory action in vitro | M(US & EU) | [8,82–85,124] |
Promogran Prisma™ Matrix | Freeze-dried matrix equanimous of 55% bovine type I collagen with 44% ORC and 1% silverish-ORC | Aforementioned benefits as Promogran™ Matrix Silverish provides both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties. | M(US & Eu) | [8,82–85,124] |
ColActive® PLUS | Porcine collagen, sodium alginate, CMC, EDTA and silver chloride | EDTA and collagen target and deactivate elevated MMP Activity | G(United states & EU) | [125–127] |
Suprasorb® X + PHMB | Biocellulose dressing made upward of small-pored HydroBalance fibres that are produced using Acetobacter xylinium | Exudate control | M(US & Eu) | [128–132] |
BIOSTEP™ Collagen Matrix | Porcine gelatin and type I collagen matrix, EDTA, CMC and alginate | EDTA and collagen target and deactivate elevated MMPs activeness | M(U.s.a.) | [74,75] |
Cutimed® Epiona | Fenestrated substrate made of 90% native bovine-derived collagen and 10% alginate | MMPs sequestered by the substrate due to collagen-bounden properties. | Thou(US & EU) | [76,77] |
Grafix® | Cryopreserved placental membrane, comprised of native viable cells, GFs and ECM | Retention of epithelial cells, fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells ↓ TNF-α and IL-1α ↑ IL-10 | M(United states of america) | [133–136] |
Synthetic Dressings | ||||
UrgoStart® | Soft-adherent foam dressing with TLC and NOSF | Neutralisation of backlog proteases | M(European union) | [95–101] |
PVA Sponge + MCG | Polyvinyl alcohol sponge impregnated with modified collagen gel | Promote shift of macrophage phenotype from 'M1' to 'M2' ↑ IL-10, IL-4 and VEGF | R | [31] |
Drawtex® | Hydroconductive dressing obtained using LevaFibre™ applied science, made of two absorbent, cross-activeness structures of viscose (63.2%) and polyester (26.8%) | Locks exudate and components away from the wound through capillary action ↓ MMPs levels | K(US & European union) | [29,30,137] |
Biatain® Ag | Polyurethane foam with semi-permeable, bacteria- and top waterproof film | Exudate command Minimise risk of maceration and leakage | M(European union) | [138–141] |
Dermagraft® | Polyglactin mesh with neonatal foreskin fibroblasts | Stimulate granulation tissue formation Stimulate secretion of cytokines and growth factors | M(United states) | [142–146] |
Legend: ↑: up-regulate; ↓: down-regulate, (US): canonical to market in the United States; (Eu): canonical to market in the European union; (US & Eu): approved to market in both US and EU.
Skin substitutes
Skin substitutes are bioengineered dressings made of natural or synthetic polymers gear up to mimic the physiological geometry and function of native skin [47]. Skin substitutes for recalcitrant wounds are usually either acellular or cellular dermal components or dermo-epidermal components obtained through chemical synthesis of biological components or decellularisation of native ECM [48].
Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template (Integra Life Sciences Corporation, Plainsboro, New Bailiwick of jersey, U.s.a.) was the first dermal skin substitute product approved past the Us Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It consists of a porous matrix of cross-linked bovine tendon collagen type I, shark chondroitin-6-sulfate GAG and covered past a semi-permeable silicone membrane [47,49–53]. Chondroitin-half-dozen-sulfate GAG has been shown to have anti-inflammatory result on macrophages; however, when the effects of Integra® on macrophage phenotype was analysed, a temporal down-regulation of 'M2a' macrophages (ECM deposition macrophages) was observed [54,55]. This is assumed to be due to the presence of glutaraldehyde every bit cantankerous-linking agent in Integra® [54]. Yet, clinical data show that Integra® induces deposition of collagen, histologically indistinguishable from native dermal collagen, achieving practiced quality tissue with no hypertrophic or keloid scar formation [54,56].
Decellularised xenografts have shown promising results in wound healing direction, as they retain the native construction of the ECM, which comprises not only collagen but too structural, adhesion and signalling molecules (east.m. laminin, GAGs, elastin, fibronectin) [57,58]. Endoform® Antimicrobial Dermal Template (Aroa Biosurgery Ltd., Auckland, NZ) presents a matrix of ovine forestomach (OFM) with 0.3% w/w silver chloride [59,60]. Its master component, OFM, has been shown to promote wound healing in recalcitrant wounds (wound closure achieved within iv–24 weeks) with no reports of adverse reactions when used every bit Endoform® Dermal Template [61–63]. OFM/silver has been demonstrated to be effective at inhibiting a broad spectrum of MMPs and exhibits depression cytotoxicity in vitro [32,57,64]. This large MMP-spectrum is causeless to be due to the retained native ECM structure [32,57,64]. A preliminary in vivo study showed positive results on wounds characterised past dissimilar aetiologies [65].Puracol® Ultra ECM (Puracol® Ultra ECM, Medline Industries Inc., Northfield, IL) is a decellularised porcine mesothelium matrix that has also been shown to have a loftier retention of growth factors (FGF-basic, VEGF, and TGF-β1) later on the decellularisation process, high angiogenetic potential in vitro and similar MMPs-inhibition abilities to OFM/silver [58]. Although more research is needed on skin substitutes' total effects in curbing inflammation, they correspond an attractive, admitting expensive, fashion of modulating inflammation and promoting healing [66].
Collagen dressings
Collagen plays many roles in wound direction, including chemotaxis of fibroblasts, wound contraction, induction of growth factors and cytokines, activation and inhibition of MMPs [67,68]. Together with its biocompatibility, biodegradable, and non-toxic attributes, these advantages make collagen an attractive candidate material for treating recalcitrant wounds. Numerous clinical studies highlight the benefit of collagen-based dressings for treating chronic wounds, showing faster healing rates or shorter healing times, inactivation of proteases and maintenance of moist wound environment [69–72].
There are many commercially available collagen-based wound dressings, all with different limerick but similar claims. They are made of collagen or a combination of collagen and other ECM components, such equally elastin, hyaluronic acid and chitosan or in conjunction with other biologically derived materials like alginate and cellulose [73]. BIOSTEP™ Collagen Matrix dressing (Smith & Nephew, London, U.G.) is a matrix presenting both type I and denatured (gelatin) porcine collagen with the addition of EDTA, CMC and alginate [74]. The collagen acts equally a sacrificial layer for excess MMPs, while EDTA binds and permanently inactivate them [74,75]. The presence of both collagen and gelatin is claimed to concenter both collagenase (MMP-ane) and gelatinase (MMP-2, MMP-9) [74]. Cutimed® Epiona (Essity Medical Solutions, Stockholm, Sweden) is a fenestrated substrate fabricated of xc% native bovine-derived collagen and 10% alginate [76,77]. The dressing structure is claimed to be nearly identical to homo dermis, which allows for MMP bounden and reduction in inflammation [76,77]. Despite the common employ of collagen-based wound dressings in wound care, more than enquiry is needed to understand their mechanisms of action. Many dressings lack satisfactory show-based data due to poorly-designed studies that, in many cases, are manufacture-funded or nowadays traditional dressing (i.east. saline moistened gauze) as control [69,70].
Cellulose
Cellulose is a naturally occurring polymer used in biomedical applications for its biocompatibility, biodegradability, low-toxicity and good assimilation backdrop [78,79]. In that location are different cellulose sources and derivatives. An instance is given by oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC), a chemically modified form of cellulose with haemostatic abilities [80,81]. The Promogran™ Matrix family (3M, Saint Paul, MN, Usa) of wound dressings are collagen-based dressings containing ORC (3M™ Promogran™ Protease Modulating Matrix) or ORC and argent-ORC (3M™ Promogran Prisma™ Wound Balancing Matrix). Promogran™ Matrix is composed of a freeze-dried matrix made of 55% type I bovine collagen and 45% oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC), whereas Promogran Prisma™ Matrix replaces 1% of ORC with silvery-ORC to provide the dressing with antimicrobial properties. The combination of collagen and ORC presents a series of anti-inflammatory benefits. Firstly, ORC has been shown to passively affect protease levels through its negative accuse that attracts positively charged metal ions which are essential for the activation of MMPs and thereby reduces MMPs activity [82]. ORC has the additional benefit of reducing elastase activity, an enzyme that breaks down elastin fibres within the ECM and contributes to not-healing wounds' chronicity. Studies have shown that collagen/ORC dressings reduce elastase activity and inhibit MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity in chronic wound exudate, resulting in increased healing rates [83,84]. Additionally, collagen/ORC binds platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and shields it from deposition inside the wound and γ-irradiation when loaded into the dressing during the manufacturing process, opening a series of opportunities to locally deliver exogenous growth factors and protection of endogenous growth factors inside the wound [82,83]. These benefits have also been analysed and recognised by many clinical reviews [8,85].
Functionalised collagen dressings
Numerous studies showed functionalisation of collagen-based dressings incorporating growth gene or peptides to provide a more instructive wound microenvironment to help cellular behaviour and tissue regeneration [86]. An instance is given past a chitosan-collagen hydrogel which incorporates an angiopoietin-i (Ang1) mimetic peptide, QHREDGS (glutamine-histidine-arginine-glutamic acid-aspartic acrid-glycine-serine) [33,86–88]. Ang1 has been widely recognised to positively participate in several cellular processes such as vascular protection, wound healing and inflammation, providing skin cells protection from oxidative stress [87]. This product is in development as an injectable gel and a pre-gelled patch and presents the QHREDGS peptide conjugated to the dressing's chitosan component to avert systemic circulation of the peptide and to promote a more localised activity [88]. The QHREDGS-functionalised hydrogel has been shown to ameliorate in vitro keratinocytes resistance to oxidative stress caused by elevated ROS levels, which is common in diabetic chronic wounds [87]. In improver, when co-cultured with macrophages, the Q-peptide hydrogel induces a shift in macrophages polarisation, resulting in the expression of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines; information technology, therefore, offers the potential to modulate the stalled inflammatory process in chronic wounds [33].
Growth factors accept also shown promising results when included in a scaffold as topical therapies [34,89,xc]. Long et al. [34] produced a collagen scaffold co-modified with VEGF and SDF-1α. These were loaded onto the scaffold later separately beingness fused with a collagen-bounden domain (CBD); this allows for a more controlled release of the growth factors once implanted [34]. This co-modified CBD-VEGF-SDF-1α collagen scaffold showed reduced infiltration of 'M1' macrophages together with reduced expression of IL-1β and TNF-α, 2 pro-inflammatory cytokines constitute at high levels in chronic wounds [34]. Furthermore, the synergic activeness of VEGF and SDF-1α promotes claret vessel germination, which is thought to reduce hypoxia at the wound site [34].
Silver
Ionic silver (Ag+) has been shown to provide anti-inflammatory properties in addition to its antimicrobial activity, although the mechanism of action is non well understood [15,91]. A argent nanoparticle loaded collagen/chitosan scaffold (NAg-CSS) claimed to modulate fibroblast migration and macrophage activation to promote healing has been devised past You and colleagues [35]. Compared with non-loaded collagen/chitosan scaffold, NAg-CSS significantly decreased the expression of CD68 (a macrophage marker), farther proven by the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-vi, TNF-α and TGF-β while upwardly-regulating the anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-10 and IFN-γ [35]. Fifty-fifty though argent nanoparticles' verbal anti-inflammatory mechanism is not still fully understood, the dissimilar NAg-CSS components' combinations could offering a synergic effect. Chitosan has been shown to stabilise collagen scaffolds' mechanical backdrop while too providing practical benefits such as antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [92].
Synthetic wound dressings to regulate inflammation
Synthetic wound dressings are considered not equally competitive as bio-derived every bit they do not mimic the native EMC in a like mode to bio-derived dressings [nineteen]. The most common types of polymers used in wound dressings include polyurethane, polyester, poly(glycolic acid), poly-50-lactide and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acrid) [93,94]. Compared with bio-derived dressings, constructed dressings present advantages in terms of reproducibility and tailoring every bit their synthesis is more easily controlled. Yet, they tend to be more inert, not provide a physiological microenvironment to promote healing, and consideration needs to be given to degradation components left in the host tissue [37,41].
Refer to Table 2 for a summary of dressings currently available or in the inquiry stage.
Technology lipido colloid (TLC)
The synthetic dressing UrgoStart® (Urgo Medical, Chenôve, France) presents a polyester mesh saturated with a sucrose octasulfate potassium salt (Nano Oligo Carbohydrate Factor, NOSF) embedded lipido-colloid matrix (Engineering Lipido-Colloid, TLC). NOSF and TLC composition are protected under the manufacturer'due south patent. UrgoStart (TLC-NOSF) turns into a colloidal solution, allowing for conformability to the wound bed [95]. Oligosaccharides (NOSF) take been shown to reduce MMPs level and restore growth factors biological functions, while the TLC matrix creates a moist wound surroundings [96]. Furthermore, in vitro data report decreased levels of gelatinases and an initial decrease of collagenases (MMP-ane and MMP-8) [97]. Multiple clinical studies study its effectiveness in DUs, VUs and PUs; however, there is a lack of data regarding its mechanism of action [96,98–101].
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) sponge
An exciting example of a collagen-functionalised synthetic dressing is presented by Das and co-workers [31]. The authors saturated a polyvinyl booze (PVA) sponge with a modified collagen gel (MCG), implanted it subcutaneously in a mouse model and assessed the effects on inflammation after 3 and vii days [31]. They constitute MCG increased macrophage recruitment in situ, decreased pro-inflammatory 'M1' phenotype and promoted an 'M2' phenotype [31]. This was further proved past the increased levels of anti-inflammatory IL-10 and IL-four and pro-angiogenic VEGF production [31]. Furthermore, they showed MCG induces IL-10 product via the miR-21-JNK pathway; however, the lack of testing in a wound model calls for further inquiry [31].
Summary
-
Wound treatment represents one of the most expensive burdens on healthcare systems worldwide.
-
Many chronic wounds become stuck in the inflammatory phase, which prevents healing from progressing.
-
A vast market of wound dressings presents different composition but similar claims, making it difficult for healthcare practitioners to decide the appropriate treatment.
-
Collagen is one of the virtually used materials in wound dressings since it helps mimic the native wound microenvironment.
-
Boosted research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms of action of collagen-based wound dressings to adjourn inflammation, and a improve clinical study design needs to be implemented so that the results obtained are truly valuable.
Competing Interests
H.A.T. and A.F. are employees of 3M, and S.C. and D.V.Five. received funding from 3M.
Writer Contributions
D.V.Five. wrote the newspaper with input from all authors.
Funding
The authors would like to thank the EPSRC grant reference EP/S022201/1 for funding this work.
Abbreviations
-
Ang1
-
CBD
-
CMC
-
DAMPs
danger-associated molecular patterns
-
DFUs
-
ECM
-
EDTA
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
-
FDA
Us Food and Drug Administration
-
GAGs
-
IFN-γ
-
IL-ten
interleukin-x (e.chiliad. IL-6, IL-10, IL-4, etc.)
-
LUs
-
MCG
-
MMPs
matrix metalloproteinases
-
NHS
Great britain National Health Services
-
OFM
-
ORC
oxidised regenerated cellulose
-
PAMPs
pathogen-associated molecular patterns
-
PDGF
platelet-derived growth gene
-
PHMB
polyhexamethylene biguanide
-
Pus
-
QHREDGS
glutamine–histidine–arginine–glutamic acid–aspartic acid–glycine–serine
-
ROS
-
SDF-1α
stromal prison cell-derived cistron-1α
-
TGF-β
-
TIMPs
tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases
-
TNF-α
-
VEGF
vascular endothelial growth cistron
References
ane
Uluer
,Eastward.T.
,Vatansever
,H.Southward.
andKurt
,F.O˝.
(2017
) Wound healing and microenvironment. In
Wound Healing
(
Turksen
,K.
, ed.), pp.
67
–
77
,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
Hoboken, NJ
ii
Gabriel
,A.
,Barrett
,C.
,Cullen
,B.
,Hodges
,D.
,Lee
,Westward.
,Snyder
,R.
et al (2020
)
Infection and inflammation in the wound environment: addressing issues of delayed wound healing with advanced wound dressings
.
Wounds Compend. Clin. Res. Pract.
32
,
S1
–
S17
PMID:
3
Marshall
,C.D.
,Hu
,M.S.
,Leavitt
,T.
,Barnes
,50.A.
,Lorenz
,H.P.
andLongaker
,M.T.
(2018
)
Cutaneous scarring: basic science, current treatments, and future directions
.
Adv. Wound Intendance
vii
,
29
–
45
four
Järbrink
,G.
,Ni
,Yard.
,Sönnergren
,H.
,Schmidtchen
,A.
,Pang
,C.
,Bajpai
,R.
et al (2017
)
The humanistic and economic brunt of chronic wounds: a protocol for a systematic review
.
Syst. Rev.
6
,
i
–
7
5
Sen
,C.K.
(2019
)
Homo wounds and its burden: an updated compendium of estimates
.
Adv. Wound Care
8
,
39
–
48
6
Guest
,J.F.
,Vowden
,K.
andVowden
,P.
(2017
)
The health economic burden that astute and chronic wounds impose on an average clinical commissioning group/health board in the U.k.
.
J. Wound Care
26
,
292
–
303
seven
Guest
,J.F.
,Fuller
,G.W.
andVowden
,P.
(2020
)
Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland's National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013
.
BMJ Open up
10
,
45253
eight
Wu
,Southward.
,Applewhite
,A.J.
,Niezgoda
,J.
,Snyder
,R.
,Shah
,J.
,Cullen
,B.
et al (2017
)
Oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen dressings: review of evidence and recommendations
.
Adv. Skin Wound Intendance
xxx
,
S1
–
18
9
Rodrigues
,M.
,Kosaric
,North.
,Bonham
,C.A.
andGurtner
,One thousand.C.
(2019
)
Wound healing: a cellular perspective
.
Physiol. Rev.
99
,
665
–
706
10
Dattani
,R.
andFarouk
,R.
(2010
) Wound classification. In
Principles of Surgery Vivas for the MRCS
, pp.
323
–
328
,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11
MacLeod
,A.S.
andMansbridge
,J.N.
(2016
)
The innate immune organization in acute and chronic wounds
.
Adv. Wound Intendance
5
,
65
–
78
12
Hesketh
,G.
,Sahin
,K.B.
,Due west
,Z.E.
andMurray
,R.Z.
(2017
)
Macrophage phenotypes regulate scar formation and chronic wound healing
.
Int. J. Mol. Sci.
18
,
1545
13
Krzyszczyk
,P.
,Schloss
,R.
,Palmer
,A.
andBerthiaume
,F.
(2018
)
The part of macrophages in astute and chronic wound healing and interventions to promote pro-wound healing phenotypes
.
Front. Physiol.
9
,
419
14
Dunnill
,C.
,Patton
,T.
,Brennan
,J.
,Barrett
,J.
,Dryden
,K.
,Cooke
,J.
et al (2017
)
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and wound healing: the functional office of ROS and emerging ROS-modulating technologies for augmentation of the healing process
.
Int. Wound J.
fourteen
,
89
–
96
fifteen
Rosique
,R.Thousand.
,Rosique
,One thousand.J.
andFarina Junior
,J.A.
(2015
)
Curbing inflammation in pare wound healing: a review
.
Int. J. Inflam.
2015
,
316235
16
Larouche
,J.
,Sheoran
,S.
,Maruyama
,Thou.
andMartino
,K.1000.
(2018
)
Allowed regulation of skin wound healing: mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets
.
Adv. Wound Care
vii
,
209
–
231
17
Frykberg
,R.G.
andBanks
,J.
(2015
)
Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds
.
Adv. Wound Intendance
4
,
560
–
582
18
Leaper
,D.J.
,Schultz
,K.
,Carville
,One thousand.
,Fletcher
,J.
,Swanson
,T.
andDrake
,R.
(2012
)
Extending the TIME concept: what take we learned in the past 10 years?
Int. Wound J.
9
,
i
–
19
xix
Dhivya
,Southward.
,Padma
,V.Five.
andSanthini
,E.
(2015
)
Wound dressings - a review
.
Biomedicine
5
,
24
–
28
xx
Han
,G.
andCeilley
,R.
(2017
)
Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments
.
Adv. Ther.
34
,
599
–
610
21
Oliveira
,A.
,Simões
,South.
,Ascenso
,A.
andReis
,C.P.
(2020
)
Therapeutic advances in wound healing
.
J. Dermatol. Treat
1
–
21
22
Bourdillon
,K.A.
,Delury
,C.P.
andCullen
,B.M.
(2017
)
Biofilms and delayed healing – an in vitro evaluation of silverish- and iodine-containing dressings and their upshot on bacterial and man cells
.
Int. Wound J.
14
,
1066
–
1075
23
Simões
,D.
,Miguel
,S.P.
,Ribeiro
,M.P.
,Coutinho
,P.
,Mendonça
,A.G.
andCorreia
,I.J.
(2018
)
Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: a review
.
Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.
127
,
130
–
141
24
Sarheed
,O.
,Ahmed
,A.
,Shouqair
,D.
, andBoateng
,J
. (2016
) Antimicrobial Dressings for Improving Wound Healing. In
Wound Healing: New Insights Into Ancient Challenges
,
InTechOpen, London, Great britain
25
Vowden
,P.
,Vowden
,K.
andCarville
,Thousand.
(2011
)
Antimicrobials made easy
.
Wounds Int.
2
,
ane
–
6
26
Skórkowska-Telichowska
,G.
,Czemplik
,M.
,Kulma
,A.
andSzopa
,J.
(2013
)
The local treatment and available dressings designed for chronic wounds
.
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.
68
,
e117
–
e126
27
Ghomi E
,R.
,Khalili
,S.
,Nouri Khorasani
,S.
,Esmaeely Neisiany
,R.
andRamakrishna
,S.
(2019
)
Wound dressings: current advances and future directions
.
J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
136
,
47738
28
Zhao
,R.
,Liang
,H.
,Clarke
,Due east.
,Jackson
,C.
andXue
,M.
(2016
)
Inflammation in chronic wounds
.
Int. J. Mol. Sci.
17
,
2085
31
Das
,A.
,Abas
,M.
,Biswas
,North.
,Banerjee
,P.
,Ghosh
,N.
,Rawat
,A.
et al (2019
)
A modified collagen dressing induces transition of inflammatory to reparative phenotype of wound macrophages
.
Sci. Rep.
nine
,
1429
32
Negron
,Fifty.
,Lun
,South.
andMay
,B.C.
(2014
)
Ovine forestomach matrix biomaterial is a broad spectrum inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases and neutrophil elastase
.
Int. Wound J.
eleven
,
392
–
397
33
Mandla
,Due south.
,Davenport Huyer
,Fifty.
,Wang
,Y.
andRadisic
,M.
(2019
)
Macrophage polarization with angiopoietin-one peptide QHREDGS
.
ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.
5
,
4542
–
4550
34
Long
,Grand.
,Liu
,D.
,He
,X.
,Shen
,Y.
,Zhao
,Y.
,Hou
,X.
et al (2020
)
A dual functional collagen scaffold coordinates angiogenesis and inflammation for diabetic wound healing
.
Biomater. Sci.
8
,
6337
–
6349
35
Y'all
,C.
,Li
,Q.
,Wang
,X.
,Wu
,P.
,Ho
,J.K.
,Jin
,R.
et al (2017
)
Silver nanoparticle loaded collagen/chitosan scaffolds promote wound healing via regulating fibroblast migration and macrophage activation
.
Sci. Rep.
seven
,
10489
36
Suarato
,One thousand.
,Bertorelli
,R.
andAthanassiou
,A.
(2018
)
Borrowing from nature: biopolymers and biocomposites as smart wound care materials
.
Forepart. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
6
,
137
37
Pollini
,Thousand.
andPaladini
,F.
(2020
)
Bioinspired materials for wound healing application: the potential of silk fibroin
.
Materials (Basel)
xiii
,
3361
38
Urciuolo
,F.
,Casale
,C.
,Imparato
,G.
andNetti
,P.A.
(2019
)
Bioengineered skin substitutes: the role of extracellular matrix and vascularization in the healing of deep wounds
.
J. Clin. Med.
8
,
2083
39
Olczyk
,P.
,Mencner
,Ł.
andKomosinska-Vassev
,K.
(2014
)
The role of the extracellular matrix components in cutaneous wound healing
.
Biomed. Res. Int.
2014
,
1
–
8
40
Ågren
,One thousand.S.
andWerthén
,M.
(2007
)
The extracellular matrix in wound healing: a closer look at therapeutics for chronic wounds
.
Int. J. Low Extrem Wounds
6
,
82
–
97
41
Hinderer
,S.
,Layland
,Southward.50.
andSchenke-Layland
,K.
(2016
)
ECM and ECM-like materials - biomaterials for applications in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy
.
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
97
,
260
–
269
43
Marieb
,East.Northward.
andHoehn
,G.N.
(2015
)
Human being Anatomy & Physiology, Global Edition
,
Pearson Instruction Limited
,
Harlow, UK
44
Shoulders
,M.D.
andRaines
,R.T.
(2009
)
Collagen structure and stability
.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
78
,
929
–
958
45
Karsdal
,M.A.
(2016
) Introduction. In
Biochemistry of Collagens, Laminins and Elastin. Construction, Function and Biomarkers
, (
Karsdal
,M.A.
, ed.), pp.
197
–
201
,
Academic Press
46
Pollard
,T.D.
,Earnshaw
,W.C.
,Lippincott-Schwartz
,J.
andJohnson
,G.T.
(2017
) Extracellular matrix molecules. In
Cell Biological science
, Cambridge, MA (US), 3rd edn, pp.
505
–
524
,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands
47
Savoji
,H.
,Godau
,B.
,Hassani
,G.S.
andAkbari
,M.
(2018
)
Peel tissue substitutes and biomaterial adventure assessment and testing
.
Forepart. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
vi
,
86
48
Aldana
,P.C.
andKhachemoune
,A.
(2020
)
Diabetic pes ulcers: appraising standard of care and reviewing new trends in management
.
Am. J. Clin. Dermatol.
21
,
255
–
264
49
Notodihardjo
,Due south.C.
,Morimoto
,N.
,Munisso
,M.C.
,Le
,T.K.
,Mitsui
,T.
,Kakudo
,N.
et al (2020
)
A comparison of the wound healing process subsequently the application of iii dermal substitutes with or without basic fibroblast growth factor impregnation in diabetic mice
.
J. Plast Reconstr. Artful. Surg.
73
,
1547
–
1555
l
De Francesco
,F.
,Busato
,A.
,Mannucci
,Southward.
,Zingaretti
,N.
,Cottone
,G.
,Amendola
,F.
et al (2020
)
Bogus dermal substitutes for tissue regeneration: comparison of the clinical outcomes and histological findings of two templates
.
J. Int. Med. Res.
48
,
1
–
22
51
Dalla Paola
,50.
,Cimaglia
,P.
,Carone
,A.
,Boscarino
,G.
andScavone
,Thousand.
(2021
)
Use of integra dermal regeneration template for limb salve in diabetic patients with no-pick disquisitional limb ischemia
.
Int. J. Low Extrem Wounds
twenty
,
128
–
134
52
Hicks
,C.W.
,Zhang
,G.Q.
,Canner
,J.K.
,Mathioudakis
,North.
,Coon
,D.
,Sherman
,R.L.
et al (2020
)
Outcomes and predictors of wound healing among patients with complex diabetic human foot wounds treated with a dermal regeneration template (integra)
.
Plast Reconstr. Surg.
146
,
893
–
902
53
Alnababtah
,Thou.
(2010
)
Management of the deeper wound with Integra® tissue regenerative products
.
Wounds UK
6
,
72
–
76
54
Witherel
,C.E.
,Graney
,P.L.
,Freytes
,D.O.
,Weingarten
,M.S.
andSpiller
,K.L.
(2016
)
Response of human macrophages to wound matrices in vitro
.
Wound Repair Regen.
24
,
514
–
524
55
Tan
,M.K.
andTabata
,Y.
(2014
)
Chondroitin-half dozen-sulfate attenuates inflammatory responses in murine macrophages via suppression of NF-κB nuclear translocation
.
Acta Biomater.
10
,
2684
–
2692
56
Moiemen
,N.S.
,Vlachou
,E.
,Staiano
,J.J.
,Thawy
,Y.
andFrame
,J.D.
(2006
)
Reconstructive surgery with integra dermal regeneration template: histologic study, clinical evaluation, and current practice
.
Plast Reconstr. Surg.
117
,
160S
–
174S
57
Karnik
,T.
,Dempsey
,S.G.
,Jerram
,One thousand.J.
,Nagarajan
,A.
,Rajam
,R.
,May
,B.C.H.
et al (2019
)
Ionic silvery functionalized ovine forestomach matrix - a non-cytotoxic antimicrobial biomaterial for tissue regeneration applications
.
Biomater. Res.
23
.
58
Capella-Monsonís
,H.
,Tilbury
,1000.A.
,Wall
,J.G.
andZeugolis
,D.I.
(2020
)
Porcine mesothelium matrix as a biomaterial for wound healing applications
.
Mater. Today Bio
7
,
100057
61
Liden
,B.A.
andMay
,B.C.H.
(2013
)
Clinical outcomes following the employ of ovine forestomach matrix (endoform dermal template) to treat chronic wounds
.
Adv. Peel Wound Intendance
26
,
164
–
167
62
Coutts
,P.Thou.
,Ryan
,J.
andSibbald
,R.Grand.
(2014
)
Case series of lower-extremity chronic wounds managed with an antibacterial foam dressing leap with gentian violet and methylene blue
.
Adv. Ski Wound Intendance
27
,
9
–
thirteen
63
Raizman
,R.
,Colina
,R.
andWoo
,K.
(2020
)
Prospective multicenter evaluation of an advanced extracellular matrix for wound direction
.
Adv. Peel Wound Care
33
,
437
–
444
64
Lun
,S.
,Irvine
,S.K.
,Johnson
,K.D.
,Fisher
,Due north.J.
,Floden
,E.W.
,Negron
,Fifty.
et al (2010
)
A functional extracellular matrix biomaterial derived from ovine forestomach
.
Biomaterials
31
,
4517
–
4529
65
Hill,
R.
andWoo,
K.
(2020
)
Utilization of advanced antimicrobial extracellular matrix applied science within the framework of antimicrobial stewardship
66
Samsell
,B.
,McLean
,J.
,Cazzell
,South.
,Dorsch
,One thousand.
,Moyer
,P.M.
andMoore
,M.
(2019
)
Wellness economics for treatment of diabetic human foot ulcers: a price-effectiveness analysis of 8 peel substitutes
.
J. Wound Care
28
,
S14
–
S26
67
Westgate
,S.
,Cut
,Thousand.F.
,DeLuca
,G.
andAsaad
,K.
(2012
)
Collagen dressings made easy
.
Wounds Britain
8
,
1
–
4
68
Rangaraj
,A.
,Harding
,Grand.
andLeaper
,D.
(2011
)
Function of collagen in wound management
.
Wounds UK
seven
,
54
–
63
69
Pallaske
,F.
,Pallaske
,A.
,Herklotz
,Grand.
andBoese-Landgraf
,J.
(2018
)
The significance of collagen dressings in wound direction: a review
.
J. Wound Care
27
,
692
–
702
70
Gould
,L.J.
(2016
)
Topical collagen-based biomaterials for chronic wounds: rationale and clinical application
.
Adv. Wound Intendance
5
,
19
–
31
71
Romanelli
,M.
,Mulder
,K.
,Paggi
,B.
,Macchia
,G.
,Panduri
,S.
andDini
,Five.
(2015
)
The utilise of a collagen matrix in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers
.
J. Wound Intendance
24
,
543
–
547
72
Holmes
,C.
,Wrobel
,J.
,Mac Eachern
,1000.P.
andBoles
,B.R.
(2013
)
Collagen-based wound dressings for the handling of diabetes-related foot ulcers: a systematic review
.
Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes.: Targets Ther.
6
,
17
73
Chattopadhyay
,S.
andRaines
,R.T.
(2014
)
Review collagen-based biomaterials for wound healing
.
Biopolymers
101
,
821
–
833
75
Finnegan
,South.
andPercival
,Southward.Fifty.
(2015
)
EDTA: an antimicrobial and antibiofilm amanuensis for use in wound intendance
.
Adv Wound Care
4
,
415
–
421
78
Gopi
,Southward.
,Balakrishnan
,P.
,Chandradhara
,D.
,Poovathankandy
,D.
andThomas
,Southward.
(2019
)
Full general scenarios of cellulose and its use in the biomedical field
.
Mater. Today Chem.
13
,
59
–
78
79
Sindhu
,K.A.
,Prasanth
,R.
andThakur
,V.Thousand.
(2014
) Medical Applications of Cellulose and its Derivatives: Present and Futurity. In
Nanocellulose Polym. Nanocomposites
(Vijay K.T., ed), vol. 9781118871904, pp.
437
–
477
,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
.
,
Hoboken, NJ
fourscore
Mudge
,M.C.
(2012
) Hemostasis, surgical bleeding, and transfusion. In
Equine Surgery
(Jörg A.A. and John A.S., eds), pp.
35
–
47
,
Elsevier Inc.
, Amsterdam, Kingdom of the netherlands
81
Resnik
,R.R.
(2018
) Intraoperative Complications. In
Misch's Avoiding Complications in Oral Implantology
(Randolph R.R. and Carl Due east.Chiliad., eds), pp.
267
–
293
,
Elsevier
, Amsterdam, The netherlands
82
Cullen
,B.
,Watt
,P.W.
,Lundqvist
,C.
,Silcock
,D.
,Schmidt
,R.J.
,Bogan
,D.
et al (2002
)
The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in chronic wound repair and its potential mechanism of activity
.
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
34
,
1544
–
1556
83
Cullen
,B.
,Smith
,R.
,Mcculloch
,E.
,Silcock
,D.
andMorrison
,Fifty.
(2002
)
Machinery of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
.
Wound Repair Regen.
10
,
xvi
–
25
84
Metzmacher
,I.
,Ruth
,P.
,Abel
,M.
andFriess
,W.
(2007
)
In vitro binding of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-ii), MMP-9, and bacterial collagenase on collagenous wound dressings
.
Wound Repair Regen.
15
,
549
–
555
85
Gottrup
,F.
,Cullen
,B.M.
,Karlsmark
,T.
,Bischoff-Mikkelsen
,M.
,Nisbet
,L.
andGibson
,Thousand.C.
(2013
)
Randomized controlled trial on collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silvery treatment
.
Wound Repair Regen.
21
,
216
–
225
86
Xiao
,Y.
,Reis
,L.A.
,Zhao
,Y.
andRadisic
,M.
(2015
)
Modifications of collagen-based biomaterials with immobilized growth factors or peptides
.
Methods
84
,
44
–
52
87
Xiao
,Y.
,Reis
,L.A.
,Feric
,N.
,Genu
,Due east.J.
,Gu
,J.
,Cao
,S.
et al (2016
)
Diabetic wound regeneration using peptide-modified hydrogels to target re-epithelialization
.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. UsA.
113
,
E5792
–
E5801
88
Sparks
,H.D.
,Sigaeva
,T.
,Tarraf
,S.
,Mandla
,S.
,Pope
,H.
,Hee
,O.
et al (2020
)
Biomechanics of wound healing in an equine limb model: effect of location and treatment with a peptide-modified collagen–chitosan hydrogel
.
ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.
vii
,
265
–
278
89
Nardini
,M.
,Perteghella
,S.
,Mastracci
,Fifty.
,Grillo
,F.
,Marrubini
,G.
,Bari
,E.
et al (2020
)
Growth factors delivery system for skin regeneration: an advanced wound dressing
.
Pharmaceutics
12
,
120
90
practise Amaral
,R.J.F.C.
,Zayed
,Northward.1000.A.
,Pascu
,Eastward.I.
,Cavanagh
,B.
,Hobbs
,C.
,Santarella
,F.
et al (2019
)
Functionalising collagen-based scaffolds with platelet-rich plasma for enhanced skin wound healing potential
.
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
7
,
371
91
Tsang
,Chiliad.One thousand.
,Kwong
,E.Westward.Y.
,Woo
,K.Y.
,To
,T.South.S.
,Chung
,J.W.Y.
andWong
,T.K.S.
(2015
)
The anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activeness of nanocrystalline silver and manuka dear on the molecular alternation of diabetic foot ulcer: a comprehensive literature review
.
Evid. Based Complement Altern. Med.
2015
,
218283
92
Zhao
,D.
,Yu
,S.
,Sun
,B.
,Gao
,South.
,Guo
,S.
andZhao
,K.
(2018
)
Biomedical applications of chitosan and its derivative nanoparticles
.
Polymers (Basel)
ten
,
462
93
Kontogiannopoulos
,K.N.
,Assimopoulou
,A.N.
,Tsivintzelis
,I.
,Panayiotou
,C.
andPapageorgiou
,Five.P.
(2011
)
Electrospun cobweb mats containing shikonin and derivatives with potential biomedical applications
.
Int. J. Pharm.
409
,
216
–
228
94
Mogoşanu
,G.D.
andGrumezescu
,A.Yard.
(2014
)
Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing
.
Int. J. Pharm.
463
,
127
–
136
95
Dowsett
,C.
(2017
)
Using TLC-NOSF advanced wound dressing to improve outcomes for patients with leg and diabetic foot ulcers
.
Wounds U.k.
13
,
113
–
117
96
Schmutz
,J.-L.
,Meaume
,S.
,Fays
,South.
,Ourabah
,Z.
,Guillot
,B.
,Thirion
,Five.
et al (2008
)
Evaluation of the nano-oligosaccharide factor lipido-colloid matrix in the local direction of venous leg ulcers: results of a randomised, controlled trial
.
Int. Wound J.
5
,
172
–
182
97
White
,R.
,Cowan
,T.
andGlover
,D.
(2011
)
Supporting bear witness based practice: clinical review of TLC healing matrix
.
J. Wound Intendance
24
,
S29
–
S36
98
Augustin
,M.
,Herberger
,M.
,Kroeger
,Thou.
,Muenter
,K.C.
,Goepel
,L.
andRychlik
,R.
(2016
)
Cost-effectiveness of treating vascular leg ulcers with UrgoStart® and UrgoCell® Contact
.
Int. Wound J.
xiii
,
82
–
87
99
Lázaro-Martínez
,J.Fifty.
,Edmonds
,K.
,Rayman
,G.
,Apelqvist
,J.
,Van Acker
,One thousand.
,Hartemann
,A.
et al (2019
)
Optimal wound closure of diabetic human foot ulcers with early initiation of TLC-NOSF treatment: mail service-hoc analysis of explorer
.
J. Wound Intendance
28
,
358
–
367
100
Sigal
,One thousand.-L.
,Addala
,A.
,Maillard
,H.
,Chahim
,Grand.
,Sala
,F.
,Blaise
,S.
et al (2019
)
Evaluation of TLC-NOSF dressing with poly-absorbent fibres in exuding leg ulcers: two multicentric, unmarried-arm, prospective, open up-characterization clinical trials
.
J. Wound Intendance
28
,
164
–
175
102
Ong
,C.T.
,Zhang
,Y.
,Lim
,R.
,Samsonraj
,R.
,Masilamani
,J.
,Phan
,T.H.H.
et al (2015
)
Preclinical evaluation of TegadermTM supported nanofibrous wound matrix dressing on porcine wound healing model
.
Adv. Wound Care
4
,
110
–
118
103
Leveriza-Oh
,M.
andPhillips,
T.J.
(2012
)
Dressings and postoperative care
. In
Lower Extremity Soft Tissue & Cutaneous Plastic Surgery
, 2nd edn., pp.
471
–
488
,
Elsevier Ltd.
104
Ahmed
,E.M.
(2015
)
Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review
.
J. Adv. Res.
half-dozen
,
105
–
121
105
Caló
,E.
andKhutoryanskiy V
,V.
(2015
)
Biomedical applications of hydrogels: a review of patents and commercial products
.
Eur. Polym. J.
65
,
252
–
267
107
Aderibigbe
,B.A.
andBuyana
,B.
(2018
)
Alginate in wound dressings
.
Pharmaceutics
10
,
42
108
Zhang
,G.
andZhao
,Ten.
(2020
)
Alginate hydrogel dressings for avant-garde wound direction
.
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
162
,
1414
–
1428
109
Ivins
,N.
andNaude
,L.
(2017
)
Gelling fibre dressing for moderate to highly exuding wounds shows promising exudate management - Wounds International
.
Wounds Int.
eight
,
47
–
51
111
Probst
,S.
,Saini
,C.
andSkinner
,M.B.
(2019
)
Comparison of sterile polyacrylate wound dressing with activated carbon material and a standard non-adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing with silver: a randomised controlled trial protocol
.
J. Wound Care
28
,
722
–
728
112
Browning
,P.
,White
,R.J.
andRowell
,T.
(2016
)
Comparative evaluation of the functional properties of superabsorbent dressings and their effect on exudate management
.
J. Wound Care
25
,
452
–
462
113
Barrett
,S.
,Rippon
,M.
andRogers
,A.A.
(2020
)
Treatment of 52 patients with a self-agglutinative siliconised superabsorbent dressing: a multicentre observational written report
.
J. Wound Care
29
,
340
–
349
114
Ciecholewska-Juśko
,D.
,Żywicka
,A.
,Junka
,A.
,Drozd
,R.
,Sobolewski
,P.
,Migdał
,P.
et al (2021
)
Superabsorbent crosslinked bacterial cellulose biomaterials for chronic wound dressings
.
Carbohydr. Polym.
253
,
117247
115
Beers
,P.J.
,Adgerson
,C.North.
andMillan
,S.B.
(2016
)
Porcine tri-layer wound matrix for the handling of stage IV pressure ulcers
.
JAAD Case Rep.
2
,
122
–
124
116
Brown-Etris
,1000.
,Milne
,C.T.
andHodde
,J.P.
(2019
)
An extracellular matrix graft (Oasis ® wound matrix) for treating total-thickness pressure ulcers: a randomized clinical trial
.
J. Tissue Viability
28
,
21
–
26
117
Guest
,J.F.
,Weidlich
,D.
,Singh
,H.
,La Fontaine
,J.
,Garrett
,A.
,Abularrage
,C.J.
et al (2017
)
Cost-effectiveness of using adjunctive porcine small intestine submucosa tri-layer matrix compared with standard intendance in managing diabetic foot ulcers in the The states
.
J. Wound Care
26
,
S12
–
S24
118
Sabolinski
,M.L.
andCapotorto J
,V.
(2019
)
Comparative effectiveness of a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute and a viable cryopreserved placental membrane for the treatment of diabetic pes ulcers
.
J. Comp. Eff. Res.
8
,
1229
–
1238
119
Treadwell
,T.
,Sabolinski
,Chiliad.L.
,Skornicki
,M.
andParsons
,Northward.B.
(2018
)
Comparative effectiveness of a bioengineered living cellular construct and cryopreserved cadaveric pare allograft for the treatment of venous leg ulcers in a real-world setting
.
Adv. Wound Care
7
,
69
–
76
120
Zaulyanov
,L.
andKirsner
,R.S.
(2007
)
A review of a bi-layered living jail cell handling (Apligraf) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers
.
Clin. Interv. Aging
2
,
93
–
98
121
Stone
,R.C.
,Stojadinovic
,O.
,Rosa
,A.M.
,Ramirez
,H.A.
,Badiavas
,E.
,Blumenberg
,M.
et al (2017
)
A bioengineered living cell construct activates an acute wound healing response in venous leg ulcers
.
Sci. Transl. Med.
9
,
eaaf8611
122
Rock
,R.C.
,Stojadinovic
,O.
,Sawaya
,A.P.
,Glinos
,1000.D.
,Lindley
,Fifty.E.
,Pastar
,I.
et al (2020
)
A bioengineered living cell construct activates metallothionein/zinc/MMP8 and inhibits TGFβ to stimulate remodeling of fibrotic venous leg ulcers
.
Wound Repair Regen.
28
,
164
–
176
124
Hart
,J.
,Silcock
,D.
,Gunnigle
,S.
,Cullen
,B.
,Light
,N.D.
andWatt
,P.W.
(2002
)
The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in wound repair: furnishings in vitro on fibroblast biology and in vivo in a model of compromised healing
.
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
34
,
1557
–
1570
126
Salehi
,H.
,Momeni
,M.
,Ebrahimi
,Thou.
,Fatemi
,M.J.
,Rahbar
,H.
,Ranjpoor
,F.
et al (2018
)
Comparing the consequence of colactive plus ag dressing versus nitrofurazone and vaseline gauze dressing in the handling of 2nd-degree burns
.
Ann. Burns Fire Disasters
31
,
204
–
208
PMID:
127
Karr
,J.C.
,Taddei
,A.R.
,Picchietti
,South.
,Gambellini
,G.
,Fausto
,A.K.
andGiorgi
,F.
(2011
)
A morphological and biochemical analysis comparative study of the collagen products biopad, promogram, puracol, and colactive
.
Adv. Pare Wound Care
24
,
208
–
216
128
Wiegand
,C.
,Eberlein
,T.
andAndriessen
,A.
(2017
)
Antibacterial action of polihexanide formulations in a co-civilization of HaCaT keratinocytes and Staphylococcus aureus and at different pH levels
.
Wound Repair Regen.
25
,
423
–
431
129
Fumarola
,S.
,Butcher
,Yard.
,Cooper
,P.
,Gray
,D.
,Russell
,F.
,Stringfellow
,S.
et al (2010
)
A clinical audit of Suprasorb® X + PHMB
.
Wounds United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland
six
(
3
),
78
–
87
130
de Mattos
,I.B.
,Holzer
,J.C.J.
,Tuca
,A.-C.
,Groeber-Becker
,F.
,Funk
,M.
,Popp
,D.
et al (2019
)
Uptake of PHMB in a bacterial nanocellulose-based wound dressing: a feasible clinical procedure
.
Burns
45
,
898
–
904
131
Fifty&R Medical UK Ltd. Suprasorb ®X + PHMB Antimicrobial hydrobalance wound dressing. n.d
132
Lenselink
,E.
andAndriessen
,A.
(2011
)
A cohort written report on the efficacy of a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms in wounds
.
J. Wound Intendance
twenty
,
534
–
539
133
Gibbons
,Thou.Westward.
(2015
)
Grafix ®, a cryopreserved placental membrane, for the treatment of chronic/stalled wounds
.
Adv. Wound Care
4
,
534
–
544
134
Duan-Arnold
,Y.
,Gyurdieva
,A.
,Johnson
,A.
,Uveges
,T.E.
,Jacobstein
,D.A.
andDanilkovitch
,A.
(2015
)
Retention of endogenous feasible cells enhances the anti-inflammatory activity of cryopreserved amnion
.
Adv. Wound Intendance
iv
,
523
–
533
135
Frykberg
,R.Grand.
,Gibbons
,G.W.
,Walters
,J.L.
,Wukich
,D.G.
andMilstein
,F.C.
(2017
)
A prospective, multicentre, open up-characterization, single-arm clinical trial for treatment of chronic complex diabetic human foot wounds with exposed tendon and/or bone: positive clinical outcomes of feasible cryopreserved human placental membrane
.
Int. Wound J.
14
,
569
–
577
136
Lavery
,L.A.
,Fulmer
,J.
,Shebetka
,K.A.
,Regulski
,M.
,Vayser
,D.
,Fried
,D.
et al (2014
)
The efficacy and safe of Grafix ® for the handling of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: results of a multi-centre, controlled, randomised, blinded, clinical trial
.
Int. Wound J.
11
,
554
–
560
137
Sood
,A.
,Granick
,M.S.
andTomaselli
,North.L.
(2014
)
Wound dressings and comparative effectiveness data
.
Adv. Wound Care
3
,
511
–
529
138
Senet
,P.
,Bause
,R.
,Jørgensen
,B.
andFogh
,K.
(2014
)
Clinical efficacy of a silver-releasing cream dressing in venous leg ulcer healing: a randomised controlled trial
.
Int. Wound J.
11
,
649
–
655
141
Leaper
,D.
,Münter
,C.
,Meaume
,S.
,Scalise
,A.
,Mompó
,N.B.
,Jakobsen
,B.P.
et al (2013
)
The use of biatain Ag in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: meta-assay of randomised controlled trials
.
PLoS One
eight
,
e67083
.
142
Hart
,C.E.
,Loewen-Rodriguez
,A.
andLessem
,J.
(2012
)
Dermagraft: use in the treatment of chronic wounds
.
Adv. Wound Care
1
,
138
–
141
143
Marston
,West.A.
,Hanft
,J.
andNorwood
,P
. (2003
) The Efficacy and Prophylactic of Dermagraft in Improving the Healing of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers Results of a prospective randomized trial.
Diabetes Care
26
,
1701
–
1705
144
Marston
,W.A.
(2004
)
Dermagraft®, a bioengineered man dermal equivalent for the treatment of chronic nonhealing diabetic foot ulcer
.
Expert Rev. Med. Devices
1
,
21
–
31
145
Martinson
,M.
andMartinson
,N.
(2016
)
Comparative assay of pare substitutes used in the management of diabetic pes ulcers
.
J. Wound Care
25
,
S8
–
17
Source: https://portlandpress.com/emergtoplifesci/article/5/4/523/229143/Wound-dressings-curbing-inflammation-in-chronic
Post a Comment for "Curbing Inflammation in Skin Wound Healing a Review"